Data Fusion, Use of Causal Inference Methods for Integrated Information from Multiple Sources
Date: Thursday 23rd October 2025
Time: 14:00-16:00 BST | 15:00-17:00 CET
Location: Online via Zoom
Speakers: Antonio Remiro-Azocar (Novo Nordisk), Benjamin Ackerman (Johnson & Johnson), Nerissa Nance (Novo Nordisk A/S) and Hana Lee, FDA
Who is this event intended for?: Statisticians involved in or interested in evidence integration and causal inference.
What is the benefit of attending?: Learn about recent developments in evidence integration and causal inference from key experts in academia and industry.
Cost
This webinar is free to both Members of PSI and Non-Members.
Registration
To register for this event, please click here
Overview
Integrating clinical trial evidence from clinical trial and real-world data is critical in marketing and post-authorization work. Causal inference methods and thinking can facilitate that work in study design and analyses. In study planning, causal inference thinking can clarify the target estimand and the fitness-for-purpose evaluation of each data source. In analysis, methods can evaluate between source data heterogeneity and use efficient estimators.
This webinar will focus on causal inference/data fusion and illustrate their use with multiple case studies. Our first speaker, Benjamin Ackerman, will provide an overview of terminology and various approaches for combining evidence from clinical trials and real-world data. He will highlight key considerations for appropriate data selection, draw connections between use-cases, and introduce relevant frameworks for study design and analysis. The second speaker, Nerissa Nance will review research projects leveraging clinical trial and real-world data in full development. Our discussant (yet to be confirmed) will provide remarks on presented topics and a look forward.
Speaker details
|
Speaker
|
Biography
|
Abstract
|

Antonio Remiro-Azocar, Novo Nordisk |
Dr Antonio Remiro-Azócar is a statistical methodologist within the Methods and Outreach department in Novo Nordisk. His expertise lies in quantitative evidence synthesis, health technology assessment and data fusion. Prior to his current role, Antonio was lead statistician for health technology assessment at Bayer and an independent contractor providing statistical support to contract research organizations. Antonio holds a PhD in Statistical Science and an MSc in Machine Learning from University College London. |
|
Benjamin Ackerman, Johnson & Johnson |
Benjamin Ackerman is a Principal Scientist at Johnson & Johnson, where he provides support across therapeutic areas to design and analyze randomized trials, namely those that combine trial data with real-world data. He has expertise in causal inference methods to address various biases in both randomized trials and non-experimental studies, namely to transport inferences from one population to another, and to correct for outcome measurement error. Previously, he worked as a Quantitative Scientist at Flatiron Health, an oncology real-world data vendor, where he oversaw the design of studies leveraging EHR data to improve cancer care in the United States. Ben holds a PhD in Biostatistics from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. |
“What is data fusion? Overview of approaches to integrate evidence from multiple data sources”
While randomized trials remain the gold standard for estimating causal effects, there are often concerns that trial participants are not representative of broader target populations, thereby impeding the generalizability (or external validity) of trial inferences. Non-experimental studies may be valuable sources of evidence for drug effectiveness in routine care settings covering broader patient populations; however, such data are subject to many sources of bias that threaten internal validity and limit causal interpretations.
Data fusion, or the integration of information from multiple sources, presents an opportunity to leverage strengths from both randomized and non-experimental studies and generate valid causal inferences. This presentation will provide an overview of terminology and various approaches to combine evidence from multiple sources, namely clinical trials and real-world data. Key considerations for appropriate data selection will be discussed, and relevant frameworks for study design and analysis will be introduced.
|
Nerissa Nance, Novo Nordisk A/S |
Nerissa Nance is a Lead Scientist at Novo Nordisk, where she is part of a diverse scientific team that fosters strong academic collaborations with external institutions to leverage new and innovative methodologies and generate strategic insights. Much of this work is housed under the umbrella of the Joint Initiative for Causal Inference (JICI): a collaboration between Novo Nordisk and UC Berkeley, Oxford, UCL, and others. The group’s work spans several causal inference-related methods relevant to trial analyses, one of which is the integration of trial and real-world data to improve efficiency, generalizability and feasibility. Nerissa holds a master’s and PhD in Biostatistics and Epidemiology, respectively, from UC Berkeley; her dissertation focused on applications of longitudinal causal inference methods using targeted learning. |
“Borrowed [person] time: case studies of data fusion in the JICI collaboration”
The traditional placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trial (CVOT) has been a historical cornerstone, yet it can no longer answer the relevant questions of the time. How can we begin to think outside the CVOT box? Collaborations between academia and industry help to ground ivory tower questions in concrete and relevant examples, and simultaneous help to push industry leaders to demand more from their data. We will review a few relevant projects from the Novo-UC Berkeley and Novo-Oxford collaborations that begin to address how external data can be harnessed: methodologies, key assumptions, and advantages/limitations. |
Hana Lee, FDA |
Hana Lee, PhD, is a Senior Statistical Reviewer in the Office of Biostatistics (OB) at the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), FDA. She leads and oversees various FDA-led projects that support the development of the agency’s real-world evidence (RWE) program. She also serves as co-lead of the RWE Scientific Working Group of the American Statistical Association (ASA) Biopharmaceutical Section, a FDA public-private partnership involving scientists from the FDA, academia, and industry to advance the understanding of real-world data (RWD) and RWE to support regulatory decision-making. In 2024, she received the FDA’s most prestigious award for excellence in advancing and promoting statistical innovation in the use of RWD/RWE for regulatory decision-making. |
"Regulatory definitions of RWD/RWE: Why They Matter for Hybrid Design" |